English 10 Introduction Assignment

Test

This is a good assignment. wanna have a try when I'm free.

English 10 Introduction Assignment

This assignment is intended to familiarize you with some of the
basic concepts and skills related to English 10. This is the first
meaningful assignment for English 10, so complete it with care.
Student Name: Student No.
Address: Date:
Postal Code:

Complete the following English 10 Assignment independently and return
it to your teacher based on the instructions provided by your school. No
external resources are required to complete this assignment.
There are three parts to this assignment:
Part A: Critical Reading 5 marks
Part B: Non-fiction 19 marks
Part C: Fiction 19 marks
Total: 43 marks
Contents: 13 pages
19 multiple-choice questions
2 written-response questions
Assignment length: 2 hours

English 10: Introduction Assignment
Part A
Critical Reading
5 Marks Suggested time: 10 minutes
Identify each of the following statements as either a fact or an opinion.
1. The benefits of animal testing over other types of research are obvious.
a. fact
b. opinion ( )
2. An author often develops atmosphere by the way he/she describes
setting.
a. fact
b. opinion ( )
3. It is always a good idea to do a thought web before writing.
a. fact
b. opinion ( )
4. Propaganda is a technique that has been employed in numerous
countries.
a. fact
b. opinion ( )
5. In a study conducted by three independent organizations, researchers
found that over-exposure to UV-B rays causes sunburn.
a. fact
b. opinion ( )

Part B
Non-fiction
19 Marks Suggested time: 50 minutes
Instructions: Read the non-fiction article, “The Ideas that Shape Scientific
Theories.” Then, complete the multiple-choice questions and the writtenresponse
question that follow.
Context statement: Many scientists and astronomers have made important
contributions to western science over the centuries. The following article
focuses on some of these scientists and their contributions.
The Ideas that Shape Scientific Theories
Planetary Theories
Planetary theories seek to explain how our universe works. Scientists are
continually testing existing theories to see if they accurately explain how the
world around us works.
There have been many scientists, mathematicians, and astronomers who
have made significant contributions to the study of astronomy1 in western
science over the centuries. Three such people are Claudius Ptolemy, Nicolaus
Copernicus, and Johannes Kepler. Outside of western science, many other
people around the world have also made advances in astronomy.
Ptolemy’s Perfect Circles
Claudius Ptolemy was a geometrical astronomer who lived around 140 AD.
Based on Aristotle’s philosophy of a geocentric (earth-centred) universe,
Ptolemy built a specific mathematical model of the universe. He used
geometry to explain the positions and movement of the celestial bodies in
the sky.
Ptolemy’s model was based on the idea that the moon, sun, planets, and stars
moved around the earth in a series of circular orbits2.
5 Ptolemy’s theory, however, didn’t answer the question about what the
planets, sun, and stars are, and why they move so strangely. Over time, more
and more accurate measurements were made, and additional corrections
1. astronomy – the scientific study of celestial objects (e.g., planets, stars, galaxies,
comets)
2. orbit – the path an object makes around another object under the influence of a
force like gravity

had to be made to his theory. Despite these weaknesses, Ptolemy’s theory
remained the primary theory for the study of astronomy for over one
thousand years.
Copernicus Defies Geocentrism
Niclas Kopernik (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473–1543) is considered the
founder of the heliocentric (sun-centred) planetary theory. By this time,
Ptolemy’s theory had been adjusted repeatedly to fit new planetary
observations and measurements. A new theory was needed. Copernicus
proposed a new theory, which was simpler and proved to be more accurate.
His theory placed the sun at the centre of the solar system, with all of the
planets (including Earth) revolving around it in circular orbits.
To deny Earth’s position at the centre of the universe was unheard of in his
time, and Copernicus was very cautious about publishing his theory. He did
not publish his theory until the year he died.
Figure 1
Earth Sun
Sun
Earth
The Copernicus Model The Ptolemy Model
Earth Sun
Earth
The Copernicus Model The Ptolemy Model
Kepler Rejects the Circles
Johannes Kepler (1571–1630) was a mathematician and a follower of
Copernicus’ heliocentric theory. His mathematical calculations led him to
propose that the planetary orbits were elliptical, not circular. This change
led to far more accurate predictions of the positions of the planets than any
previous theory could produce. He also proposed that the sun influences the
speed of the planets. This was to become the foundation for Isaac Newton’s
gravitational theories.
Improving Theories
The descriptions you have just read show how scientific theories change over
time. Scientists adjust and change theories as they discover new information

and evidence. The theories that fit the observable data best are the theories
that last.
10 New theories are extremely valuable because they ignite curiosity and lead to
the development of other related theories.
Case Study—An Ancient Astronomer
Aryabhatta, born in 476 CE in what is now the Indian state of Kerala, was
perhaps the most celebrated Indian mathematician of his time. When he was
23 years old, Aryabhatta wrote an advanced astronomy and mathematics text
called Aryabhattiya.
Some of his achievements in astronomy include:
♦♦ calculating the circumference of the Earth (and getting very close to the
accepted value of today)
♦♦ calculating the length of one year to be 365 days, 6 hours, 12 minutes,
and 30 seconds (only a few minutes longer than our current accepted
value)
♦♦ proposing a heliocentric (sun-centred) planetary theory (more than a
thousand years before Copernicus)
♦♦ inferring that the orbits of the planets were ellipses
♦♦ proposing that the Earth rotates on its axis
♦♦ accurately explaining both solar and lunar eclipses
Since his text was not translated into Latin until the 13th century, it had very
little influence on European astronomy. European astronomers reached many
of the same conclusions independently. Aryabhatta’s lack of influence in
Europe should not lessen the importance of the contributions he made to the
study of mathematics and astronomy.
6. Which of the following statements best defines the word heliocentric?
a. The sun is a stationary object.
b. The earth is the centre of the universe.
c. Heavenly objects revolve around the sun.
d. The planets and sun revolve in a circular orbit. ( )
7. Which ideas did Ptolemy contribute?
a. geocentric, circular orbits
b. geocentric, elliptical orbits
c. heliocentric, circular orbits
d. heliocentric, elliptical orbits ( )

8. With which statement would Kepler most likely agree?
a. The sun revolves around the earth in a circular orbit.
b. The earth revolves around the sun in a circular orbit.
c. The earth revolves around the sun in an elliptical orbit.
d. The sun revolves around the earth in an elliptical orbit. ( )
9. Which astronomer took the biggest risk in publishing his theories?
a. Kepler
b. Ptolemy
c. Aryabhatta
d. Copernicus ( )
10. With which model in Figure 1 would Aryabhatta most likely agree?
a. the Ptolemy model
b. the Copernicus model ( )
11. Which statement best illustrates the main idea of the passage?
a. Aryabhatta’s theories were unknown in the west for many years.
b. Theories change as scientists discover new information and evidence.
c. Ptolemy’s primary theory is the most important because it lasted
the longest.
d. European astronomers have made the most important
contributions to science. ( )
12. Which word best describes the purpose of this article?
a. inform
b. amuse
c. criticize
d. entertain ( )

Written Response: Writing a Summary (12 marks)

Test

13. In a well-developed paragraph of approximately 125 words, write a
summary of the article.
Tips for writing:
♦♦ use your own words
♦♦ don’t copy or quote from the article
♦♦ focus on main ideas
♦♦ check your work
Organization and Planning
Use this space to plan your ideas before writing the response.
This area will not be marked.
........

Part C
Fiction
19 Marks Suggested time: 60 minutes
Instructions: Read the story, “It was the Strangest Thing.” Then, complete
the multiple-choice questions and the written-response question that follow.
It Was The Strangest Thing
It was the strangest thing. One minute he was standing by the ocean with his
sister Stacy arguing about what they were going to do that morning, and the
next minute there was no ocean. The water drained out of the bay so fast it
was like somebody took an invisible straw and sucked it up in one big gulp.
Where there was water, pink coral reefs now gleamed in the sun. Fish flailed
on dark, wet sand.
“Hey, Jason, is that weird or what?” Stacy said.
It was weird, but he was too angry to agree. Day three of their family holiday
in Thailand and he was already tired of his ten-year-old sister tagging along.
He was fifteen; he wanted to have his own kind of fun. Without her.
5 Just as he was about to crack a joke about her being the weird one, Jason saw
the wave. It was a wall of frothing, angry water and it was coming right for
them.
For a second, he couldn’t move…or even breathe. Everything seemed to slow
down. A monstrous roar filled the air. He heard screams. Then the mist hit his
cheeks and his adrenalin kicked in. He grabbed Stacy’s hand. “Run fast!” he
yelled, yanking her up the hill towards the hotel. Their mom and dad were at
the top, gesturing frantically for them to hurry.
They didn’t get very far. The wave picked them up and smashed them against
the wall of the hotel restaurant. Jason gripped Stacy’s hand tighter than he’d
ever gripped anything in his life. It didn’t matter. The water flung them apart
like they were nothing more than paper dolls. Jason went one way, she went
the other.
“Jason!” Stacy cried. Her face was white with terror; she lunged for him.
“Help!”
He tried to reach her but the water sucked him under. He hadn’t taken a
breath and his lungs felt squashed, like there was a semi-trailer sitting on top
of them. He wondered if he was going to die.

10 No, he thought. He had too much living left to do!
The answer gave him the strength to fight his way to the top. Clothes and
chairs and bits of debris swirled on the surface of the water. A watch and
wallet sailed by. He hardly noticed. He was looking for Stacy. For his mom or
dad. Jason didn’t know where they were, which way they’d gone.
Panicked, he tried to swim, but the water was in control. It carried him
around the side of the hotel to the lobby. Glass shattered, people screamed. A
piece of counter smashed into his arm. The pain was so bad he almost passed
out. He felt himself being pushed through the hotel to the parking lot. There
were people everywhere, but no parents. No Stacy.
Then, just before his tears started, he heard her call. “Jason, I’m here!” Stacy
had grabbed hold of a palm tree and climbed to the top.
It took them a long time, but they finally made it up the hill away from the
water. His parents made it too. They were all scraped and battered, but they
were alive.
15 Since that happened, Jason has never felt the same way about life. Or about
little sisters. He’s certain now that both are gifts. If anyone thinks that’s corny,
he’d just tell them to try living through a tsunami, and then talk to him.
14. At the beginning of the story, which quote best describes how Jason
feels about his sister?
a. “he was standing by the ocean with his sister” (paragraph 1)
b. “he was too angry to agree” (paragraph 4)
c. “he was already tired of his ten-year-old sister tagging along”
(paragraph 4)
d. “he was about to crack a joke about her being the weird one”
(paragraph 5) ( )
15. Which action completes the sequence?
Stacy grabs onto
the palm tree
?
Jason and Stacy
are separated
Jason and Stacy
begin to run
a. Jason is injured
b. Stacy follows Jason around
c. Jason and Stacy make it up the hill
d. Jason and Stacy’s parents call for them ( )

16. Which word best describes Jason’s emotion in “No, he thought. He had
too much living left to do!” (paragraph 10)?
a. fear
b. anger
c. bitterness
d. loneliness ( )
17. What is the meaning of the word “tsunami” (paragraph 15)?
a. empty bay
b. Thailand holiday
c. tropical palm tree
d. powerful ocean wave ( )
18. Which statement is most likely to make Jason angry?
a. Family bonds are important.
b. We learn from our experiences.
c. Make sure you focus on yourself.
d. Don’t take life events so seriously. ( )
19. Which word best describes the mood of this story?
a. quiet
b. depressing
c. suspenseful
d. light-hearted ( )
20. Which phrase could best be used an alternate title for this story?
a. Terror in Thailand
b. Swimming Lessons
c. Little Sisters are Annoying
d. Jason’s Boring Family Vacation ( )

Written Response: Writing an Expository Paragraph (12 marks)
21. In a well-developed paragraph of approximately 125 words, explain how
Jason’s character changes over the course of the story.
Questions to consider:
♦♦Why has Jason’s character changed?
♦♦What did he learn or come to understand?
Tips for writing:
♦♦ have a good topic sentence
♦♦ explain yourself clearly
♦♦ check your work
Organization and Planning
Use this space to plan your ideas before writing the response.
This area will not be marked.

......

/5 Part A: Critical Reading
/19 Part B: Non-fiction
/19 Part C: Fiction
/43 Total
If time permits, please reread your work
and add your initials below:

I REREAD MY WORK:
Student’s Initials:
Writing Rubric
6
Ideas are fully developed and supported. Accomplishes the purpose with some
originality, individuality or maturity. Effective word choice and sentence variety.
Voice and tone engage the audience throughout. Structure is logical and the
writing as a whole may appear effortless. Errors are not distracting.
5
Ideas are well-developed and supported. Has a clear sense of purpose. Appropriate
word choice and sentence variety. Voice and tone generally engage the audience.
Structure is logical and the writing demonstrates control. Errors are not distracting.
4
Ideas are generally straightforward and clear, with some support and sense
of purpose. Basic vocabulary, some sentence variety. Attempts to engage the
audience, but lacks a consistent voice. Structure may be formulaic. Errors generally
do not impede meaning.
3
Ideas are often listed or developed unevenly, with little support or sense of
purpose. Limited vocabulary and sentence variety. Lacks a sense of audience and
voice. Structure may be weak. Errors may distract and impede meaning.
2
Ideas are often broad generalizations with little support, and no clear purpose.
Colloquial vocabulary, weak sentence structure. Writing reflects little understanding
of language conventions. Inappropriate tone or language for audience. Structure
may seem illogical. Frequent noticeable errors interfere with meaning.
1
Ideas are not developed. Has no discernible purpose. May be too brief to accomplish
the task. Lacks structure. Frequent serious errors.
0
No attempt to address the topic or is a restatement of the topic.
Note: This is a first-draft response and should be assessed as such. The use of
paragraph structure should be assessed holistically with reference to the clarity
of organization and expression. The connection to the topic may be explicit or
implicit.
This scoring rubric is derived from the BC Performance Standards for Impromptu Writing.

The pdf file is here: English 10 Introduction Assignment